Tools
Tools
Cavanagh, RD, Broszeit, S, Pilling, GM, Grant, SM, Murphy, EJ and Austen, MC 2016 Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: a useful way to manage and conserve marine resources? [in special issue: The value of biodiversity in the Anthropocene] Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283 (1844). 20161635. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1635
|
Text
Cavanagh etal16 Valuing marine biodiversity.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (435kB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
Valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) is widely recognized as a useful, though often controversial, approach to conservation and management. However, its use in the marine environment, hence evidence of its efficacy, lags behind that in terrestrial ecosystems. This largely reflects key challenges to marine conservation and management such as the practical difficulties in studying the ocean, complex governance issues and the historically-rooted separation of biodiversity conservation and resource management. Given these challenges together with the accelerating loss of marine biodiversity (and threats to the ES that this biodiversity supports), we ask whether valuation efforts for marine ecosystems are appropriate and effective. We compare three contrasting systems: the tropical Pacific, Southern Ocean and UK coastal seas. In doing so, we reveal a diversity in valuation approaches with different rates of progress and success. We also find a tendency to focus on specific ES (often the harvested species) rather than biodiversity. In light of our findings, we present a new conceptual view of valuation that should ideally be considered in decision-making. Accounting for the critical relationships between biodiversity and ES, together with an understanding of ecosystem structure and functioning, will enable the wider implications of marine conservation and management decisions to be evaluated. We recommend embedding valuation within existing management structures, rather than treating it as an alternative or additional mechanism. However, we caution that its uptake and efficacy will be compromised without the ability to develop and share best practice across regions.
| Item Type: | Publication - Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Ecology and Environment Economics Fisheries Management |
| Divisions: | Plymouth Marine Laboratory > Science Areas > Sea and Society |
| Depositing User: | Dr Stefanie Broszeit |
| Date made live: | 03 Mar 2017 10:24 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Apr 2020 09:58 |
| URI: | https://plymsea.ac.uk/id/eprint/7383 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |