Yang, M, Prytherch, J, Kozlova, E, Yelland, M, Parenkat Mony, D and Bell, TG 2016 Comparison of two closed-path cavity-based spectrometers for measuring air–water CO2 and CH4 fluxes by eddy covariance. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5509-2016
|
Text
Yang Picarro LGR comparison 2016.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
In recent years several commercialised closed- path cavity-based spectroscopic instruments designed for eddy covariance flux measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4 ), and water vapour (H2 O) have become avail- able. Here we compare the performance of two leading mod- els – the Picarro G2311-f and the Los Gatos Research (LGR) Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer (FGGA) at a coastal site. Both instruments can compute dry mixing ratios of CO2 and CH4 based on concurrently measured H2O, tempera- ture, and pressure. Additionally, we used a high through- put Nafion dryer to physically remove H2O from the Picarro airstream. Observed air–sea CO2 and CH4 fluxes from these two analysers, averaging about 12 and 0.12 mmol m−2 day−1 respectively, agree within the measurement uncertainties. For the purpose of quantifying dry CO2 and CH4 fluxes down- stream of a long inlet, the numerical H2O corrections ap- pear to be reasonably effective and lead to results that are comparable to physical removal of H2O with a Nafion dryer in the mean. We estimate the high-frequency attenuation of fluxes in our closed-path set-up, which was relatively small (≤ 10 %) for CO2 and CH4 but very large for the more po- lar H2O. The Picarro showed significantly lower noise and flux detection limits than the LGR. The hourly flux detection limit for the Picarro was about 2 mmol m−2 day−1 for CO2 and 0.02 mmol m−2 day−1 for CH4. For the LGR these de- tection limits were about 8 and 0.05 mmol m−2 day−1. Using global maps of monthly mean air–sea CO2 flux as reference, we estimate that the Picarro and LGR can resolve hourly CO2 fluxes from roughly 40 and 4 % of the world’s oceans respec- tively. Averaging over longer timescales would be required in regions with smaller fluxes. Hourly flux detection limits of CH4 from both instruments are generally higher than the expected emissions from the open ocean, though the signal to noise of this measurement may improve closer to the coast.
Item Type: | Publication - Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Atmospheric Sciences Oceanography |
Divisions: | Plymouth Marine Laboratory > Science Areas > Marine Biochemistry and Observations |
Depositing User: | Mingxi Yang |
Date made live: | 22 Nov 2016 13:33 |
Last Modified: | 25 Apr 2020 09:57 |
URI: | https://plymsea.ac.uk/id/eprint/7282 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |