<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-3387-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ba incorporation in benthic foraminifera</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ba incorporation in benthic foraminifera}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. J. de Nooijer et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>de Nooijer</surname><given-names>Lennart J.</given-names></name>
          <email>ldenooijer@nioz.nl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Brombacher</surname><given-names>Anieke</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mewes</surname><given-names>Antje</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Langer</surname><given-names>Gerald</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Nehrke</surname><given-names>Gernot</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bijma</surname><given-names>Jelle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Reichart</surname><given-names>Gert-Jan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Dept. of Ocean Sciences, Royal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research, Landsdiep 4, 1797 SZ 't Horntje, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Biogeosciences section, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>The Laboratory, The Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, Devon, PL1 2PB, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lennart J. de Nooijer (ldenooijer@nioz.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>3387</fpage><lpage>3400</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017.html">This article is available from https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Barium (Ba) incorporated in the calcite of many foraminiferal species is
proportional to the concentration of Ba in seawater. Since the open ocean
concentration of Ba closely follows seawater alkalinity, foraminiferal
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca can be used to reconstruct the latter. Alternatively, Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
from foraminiferal shells can also be used to reconstruct salinity in coastal
settings in which seawater Ba concentration corresponds to salinity as rivers
contain much more Ba than seawater. Incorporation of a number of minor and
trace elements is known to vary (greatly) between foraminiferal species, and
application of element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios thus requires the use of
species-specific calibrations. Here we show that calcite Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
correlates positively and linearly with seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in cultured
specimens of two species of benthic foraminifera: <italic>Heterostegina depressa</italic> and <italic>Amphistegina lessonii</italic>. The slopes of the regression,
however, vary two- to threefold between these two species (0.33 and 0.78,
respectively). This difference in Ba partitioning resembles the difference in
partitioning of other elements (Mg, Sr, B, Li and Na) in these foraminiferal
taxa. A general trend across element partitioning for different species is
described, which may help develop new applications of trace elements in
foraminiferal calcite in reconstructing past seawater chemistry.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Incorporation of barium (Ba) in foraminiferal calcite is proportional to
seawater barium concentrations (e.g., Lea and Boyle, 1989, 1990; Lea and
Spero, 1994). Open ocean surface barium concentrations are relatively uniform
(Chan et al., 1977; Broecker and Peng, 1982) and since [Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] is removed
at the surface and regenerated at depth, its vertical concentration resembles
that of alkalinity (Li and Chan, 1979; Rubin et al., 2003). For this reason,
fossil foraminiferal Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca has been used to reconstruct past alkalinity
(e.g., Lea, 1995). Locally, seawater [Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] can also reflect salinity due
to the relatively high Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of river or meltwater input (Hanor and
Chan, 1977; Guay and Falkner, 1997, 1998) and therefore Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in
foraminiferal calcite can be used to reconstruct paleosalinity (Hall and
Chan, 2004b; Weldeab et al., 2007, 2014; Bahr et al., 2013). These
reconstructions can be complicated by upwelling affecting surface Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
(Lea et al., 1989; Hatch et al., 2013). Moreover, Ba cycling at or close to
the seafloor can affect Ba uptake in benthic foraminifera (Ni Flaithearta et
al., 2010). Application of Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca critically depends on the prerequisite
that temperature, salinity as such (Lea and Spero, 1994; Hönisch et al.,
2011) and photosymbiont activity (Lea and Spero, 1992; Hönisch et al.,
2011) do not affect Ba incorporation in foraminiferal shell carbonate. Still,
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are known to vary within chamber walls of crust-producing
planktonic foraminifera (Eggins et al., 2003; Hathorne et al., 2009). Like
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, the values for Ba in crust carbonate are lower, which cannot be
(solely) explained by migration to greater water depths during crust
formation (Hathorne et al., 2009). This argues for an unknown additional
imprint on Ba incorporation. On an intratest scale, the distributions of Mg
and Ba within the test wall of <italic>Pulleniatina obliquiloculata</italic> have
been shown to co-vary to some extent, with maximum concentrations often, but
not always, coinciding with the organic linings (Kunioka et al., 2006).
For some other elements, including Mg and Sr, incorporation has been shown to
be interdependent (e.g., Mewes et al., 2015). Such interdependency, however,
varies between pairs of elements and is explained by a combination of
simultaneous fractionation by the same process (e.g., Langer et al., 2016) and
by involvement of different processes during calcification (Nehrke et al.,
2013). These models and experimental results may imply that the
incorporation of Ba could also be influenced by these physiological processes and/or the same fractionation process during calcite precipitation (e.g., through
lattice distortion; Mucci and Morse, 1983; Mewes et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>So far, Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca values have been reported for planktonic (Boyle, 1981; Lea and
Boyle, 1991; Lea and Spero, 1992; 1994; Hönisch et al., 2011; Marr et
al., 2013; Hoffmann et al., 2014) and low-Mg benthic species (Lea, 1995; Lea
and Boyle, 1989, 1990, 1993; Reichart et al., 2003). Although Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is known
to vary greatly between (benthic) foraminiferal species (between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Toyofuku et al., 2000;
Bentov and Erez, 2006; Wit et al., 2012) Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios, which is only rarely
investigated in species producing high-Mg calcite (Evans et al., 2015; Van
Dijk et al., 2017). Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in planktonic species may be used to reconstruct
(changes in) open ocean alkalinity (Lea, 1995), whereas those published for
benthics may be more suitable to reconstruct salinity in coastal and shelf
seas (Weldeab et al., 2007, 2014; Bahr et al., 2013). The range in Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is
known particularly for benthic foraminifera (e.g., Toyofuku et al., 2011;
Sadekov et al., 2014) and interspecies variability in Ba incorporation may
therefore hamper application of (benthic) foraminiferal Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Here we
present results from a culture study using the larger benthic foraminifera,
<italic>Amphistegina lessonii</italic> and <italic>Heterostegina depressa</italic>, two species with different Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Segev
and Erez, 2006 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Dueñas-Bohórquez et
al., 2011, respectively). In these culturing experiments, the range in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
exceeds the naturally occurring range in seawater to facilitate the testing
of underlying controls on barium incorporation. If there is a linear increase
in shell Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the large range in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of the culturing media prepared here will
furthermore decrease uncertainty of the obtained Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
calibration. Our results are compared to Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in these species from field
samples. Together, calibration of Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in these species against seawater
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and in the context of other elemental incorporation data, allows
the
evaluation of and application of incorporated Ba across a wider range of
foraminiferal taxa, with contrasting element composition of their shell.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Measured concentrations of major and minor ions, temperature,
salinity, and carbonate chemistry in the five culture media (A–E).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba (nmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">488.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">535.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">611.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">608.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">854.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">66.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">91.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">402</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">416</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">389</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">383</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">384</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sr (mmol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2445</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2450</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2662</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2437</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2429</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DIC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2244 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2246 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2464 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2236 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2228 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calcite</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Culture media</title>
      <p>To determine Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca partitioning, benthic foraminiferal culture
experiments were set up with five different seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios
(54–92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Media were prepared by increasing
[Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> while keeping the [Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
constant. The range of [Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] values used in these experiments exceeds
the range of concentrations found naturally and allows the testing of the
applicability of partition coefficients under conditions with artificially
high seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Seawater is only slightly undersaturated with
respect to barite (BaSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an increase in [Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] in the sea
water will cause barite precipitation (Langer et al., 2009). To be able to
increase [Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] beyond its natural range, artificial seawater was
prepared with lower sulphate contents. All other salts were added according
to the recipe of Kester et al. (1967) to produce a total of 5 L of medium
for each treatment. As <italic>Amphistegina lessonii</italic> and
<italic>Heterostegina depressa</italic> do not grow well in 100 % artificial
seawater, the prepared media were mixed with natural seawater in a ratio of
9 : 1 (Mewes et al., 2014). To double check concentrations and determine
potential loss of elements due to precipitation, sorption and/or scavenging,
element concentrations of the culture media were determined using
inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)
at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, except for Ba, which was
measured using ICP-MS at Utrecht University (Table 1).</p>
      <p>Culture media pH was adjusted to 8.0 by adding NaOH (1 M) to the prepared
media. Before the start of the experiments, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC)
and total alkalinity were measured at the Alfred Wegener Institute. DIC was
measured photometrically in triplicates with a TRAACS CS800 QuAAtro
AutoAnalyzer with an average reproducibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol
L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Alkalinity was calculated from linear Gran plots (Gran, 1952) after
triplicate potentiometric titration (Bradshaw et al., 1981) using a TitroLine
alpha plus autosampler (Schott Instruments). Parameters of the total
carbonate system were calculated from temperature, salinity, DIC and
alkalinity using the program CO2SYS adapted to Excel by Pierrot et
al. (2006). The equilibrium constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Mehrbach et
al. (1973), as reformulated by Dickson and Millero (1987), were used
(Table 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Foraminiferal culturing</title>
      <p>Living specimens of <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and <italic>H. depressa</italic> were
isolated from sediment collected at the tropical aquarium of Burger's Zoo
(Arnhem, the Netherlands) in August 2012 and transferred to the
Alfred Wegener Institute for the culture experiments. Healthy individuals of
<italic>A. lessonii</italic> showing pseudopodial activity, a dark brown cytoplasm
and minimal signs of bleaching were handpicked with a small brush under a
Zeiss Stereo microscope and transferred to well plates. Adult specimens of
<italic>H. depressa</italic> were picked directly from the aquarium with soft
tweezers. After 2 weeks several individuals of both species underwent
asexual reproduction. Individual <italic>H. depressa</italic> parent cells produced
sufficient numbers of juveniles to study separate clone groups. Approximately
20 juveniles with two or three chambers from the same parent were selected
for every treatment and divided over two petri dishes (diameter 55 mm,
containing approximately 10 mL of culture medium). In total, two clone
groups were used in the experiments, resulting in a total of at least
40 individuals per treatment. Specimens of <italic>A. lessonii</italic> did not
produce sufficient numbers of juveniles for analysis of separate clone
groups. Therefore, approximately 60 juveniles with two or three chambers from
different parents were selected per treatment and distributed evenly over
three petri dishes. All experiments were carried out in an adjustable
incubator (RUMED Rubarth Apparate GmbH) at a constant temperature of
25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. As both species are symbiont-bearing, a 12 : 12
light : dark cycle was applied with a constant photon flux density of
approximately 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during light
hours. Pictures were taken weekly under a Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted
microscope and maximal diameters of the shells were measured with the
AxioVision software to allow the determination of the chamber addition rates of the
foraminifera in the experiments. The experiments were terminated after 6 weeks.</p>
      <p>All specimens were fed <italic>Dunaliella salina</italic> algae every 3 to 4 days. Although <italic>A. lessonii</italic> hosts
symbionts, this foraminiferal species does not exclusively rely on nutrients
from their symbionts but also ingests algae (Lee, 2006). To avoid
changes in the barium concentration of the culture media, the water in the
dishes containing foraminifera was diluted as little as possible by the
solution containing the food for the foraminifera. For this purpose,
foraminifera were fed 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of a solution containing algae that was
centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min. Algae concentrated at the bottom of
the tube were transferred to an empty tube with a pipette. To prevent
changes in the culture media's carbonate chemistry by algal photosynthesis
the algae were killed by heating the concentrated solution in an oven at 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 10 min. The cultures were transferred to new petri
dishes every week to avoid excessive bacterial growth, potential build-up of
waste products and shortage of ions or nutrients. To prevent changes in
salinity by evaporation, media were refreshed 3 days after the cultures
were transferred to new dishes by pipetting approximately 5 mL of the old
media out of the petri dish and replacing it with the same volume of media
from the prepared batch.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Sample preparation and analysis</title>
      <p>At the end of the culture experiment, specimens were cleaned by placing them
in a 7 % NaOCl solution for approximately 30 min until completely
bleached and organic material was removed from the tests. This cleaning
method is shown to have a similar impact on average foraminiferal Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
values as cleaning with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and is relatively small (2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to cleaning with deionized water only (Pak et al., 2004).
Specimens were then rinsed three times for approximately 60 s in
deionized water to remove the NaOCl and any residual salts from the culture
solutions. Cleaned foraminifera were put in an oven at 42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
until completely dry and mounted on sample holders using double-sided
adhesive tape.</p>
      <p>Element composition of the calcite was determined using laser ablation
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at Utrecht
University (Reichart et al., 2003). The system consisted of a GeoLas 200Q
193 nm Excimer laser (Lambda Physik) connected to a sector field ICP-MS
(Element2, Thermo Scientific). Samples were ablated in a single-volume
chamber and the aerosol was carried to the ICP-MS by a helium flow. Monitored
masses included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Al, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mn, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ba, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U and calibration
was performed using a glass standard (NIST 610) that was ablated three times
after every 10–12 foraminiferal samples. Diameter of the ablation crater was
set to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m for all specimens and the pulse repetition rate was
6 Hz. The ablated calcite was measured and integrated with respect to time.
Energy density for the glass was higher than for the foraminifera (5 and
1 J cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). Although the resulting difference in ablation
characteristics is not likely to affect obtained foraminiferal element
concentrations (Hathorne et al., 2008), foraminiferal element concentrations
were compared to those from a calcite standard made in-house with known
element concentrations and ablated at the same energy density as the
foraminifera (Dueñas-Bohórquez et al., 2009). Relative standard
deviation for Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca based on repeated measurements on
this material was &lt; 5 % for both ratios. Due to the lamellar
nature of Rotaliid foraminifera, the final chambers are thinnest and are therefore
characterized by the largest uncertainty in the estimated average
element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratio. Therefore, the F chamber was not considered and
instead, the F-1 chamber of <italic>A. lessonii</italic> was ablated for every
specimen. For <italic>H. depressa</italic>, walls of the final two chambers were
commonly too thin for reliable chemical results and, therefore, the F-2
chamber was analyzed. In addition, for each species, the final 6–7 chambers
of 10 sufficiently large specimens (two from each of the five treatments)
were ablated to analyze intra-specimen variability in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, to analyze
variability within chamber walls as a function of thickness and to detect
potential ontogenetic trends in Ba incorporation.</p>
      <p>Elemental concentrations were calculated from the ablation profiles with the
Glitter software, using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca as an internal standard and values from
Jochum et al. (2011) for concentrations of elements in the NIST 610. This
program integrates the ablation signal after subtracting the background
signal to calculate the elemental concentrations. To avoid contaminated
intervals of the ablation profile, sections with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Al and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mn counts were excluded from the analysis since these parts are also often
characterized by unusually high Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca not reflecting the actual shell
carbonate. Ablation profiles with a duration shorter than 5 s were
rejected as such short profiles are unreliable due to poor counting
statistics. Nine out of 188 ablation profiles were rejected for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and 7 out
of 140 profiles from <italic>H. depressa</italic> were discarded, which is less than 5 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Aquarium samples</title>
      <p>To compare the results from cultured specimens with Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca from
specimens derived from natural conditions, a number of living specimens of
both <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and <italic>H. depressa</italic> were isolated from the
zoo's stock (i.e., sediment collected at the zoo from which the specimens
were isolated; Sect. 2.2) and cleaned and prepared for LA-ICP-MS analyses as
described in Sect. 2.3. From both species, seven specimens were ablated twice
at the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
(NIOZ) using a
NWR193UC (New Wave Research) laser, containing an ArF Excimer laser (Existar)
with deep UV 193 nm wavelength and &lt; 4 ns pulse duration. Provided
that the same reference material is used, the use of multiple laser systems
(see above) is shown not to bias obtained foraminiferal element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
ratios (De Nooijer et al., 2014a). Laser ablation was performed with an
energy density of 1 J cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at a repetition rate of 6 Hz for calcite
samples and an energy density of 5 J cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the glass (NIST610)
standards. Helium was used as a carrier gas with a flow rate of
0.8 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for cell gas and 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for cup gas. From the
laser chamber to the quadrupole ICP-MS (iCAP Q, Thermo Scientific), the He
flow was mixed with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nebulizer Ar. Before measuring
the samples, the nebulizer gas, extraction lens, collision cell technology (CCT) focus lens and torch
position were automatically tuned for the highest sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg by
laser-ablating MACS-3. The masses measured by the ICP-MS were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Na,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Al, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ba. JCp-1, MACS-3 and an in-house (foraminiferal) calcite standard
(NFHS) were used for quality control and were measured every 10 foraminiferal
samples. Internal reproducibility of the analyses was all better than
9 %, based on the three different carbonate standards used. Intensity
data were integrated, background subtracted, standardized internally to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca and calibrated against the MACS-3 signal using a custom-built
MATLAB routine within the program SILLS (Guillong et al., 2008). Since
ablation of the NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 could increase the sodium
background, they were only ablated and analyzed at the end of every sequence
and cones were cleaned before the next sequence. Accuracy of the analyses was
better than 3 %, based on comparison of the carbonate standards with
internationally reported values (Okai et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2008).
Signals were screened for surface contamination and parts of the outside or
inside of the shell with elevated Mg, Mn or Al values were eliminated from
the area selected for integration.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average increase in shell diameter for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> (left
panel) and <italic>H. depressa</italic> (right panel). Dots represent the average of
all analyzed individuals from one treatment. Error bars represent the
standard deviation of the mean.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Seawater samples from the zoo's aquarium were measured in duplicate using a
sector field ICP-MS (Element2, Thermo Scientific). The ICP-MS was run in low-resolution mode (24 cycles) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ba and in medium-resolution mode (24 cycles) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca. Calibration was performed through an external
calibration series with increasing concentrations of Ba.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Test diameter increase</title>
      <p>Average shell diameters increased considerably during the experimental
period (Fig. 1). Overall, increase in shell
diameter did not significantly differ between treatments. Treatment C
(seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <italic>A. lessonii</italic>, however, shows somewhat reduced
chamber addition rates per incubated specimen. This may be the consequence
of slightly higher mortality under these conditions and a relatively high
number of specimens that did not add any chambers. Although not
systematically investigated, two petri dishes from this treatment contained
relatively many bleached (i.e., devoid of symbionts) specimens at the end of
the 6-week period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Foraminiferal Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca as a function of seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca.
Light circles indicate individual laser ablation measurements. Larger, darker
shaded circles represent the average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for one
treatment. Relative standard deviation varies between 16 and 20 % for
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and between 5 and 15 % for <italic>H. depressa</italic>. Average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios for the two species collected from the aquarium
are indicated by triangles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SD) and were not taken into account when
calculating the regression. Calculated regressions are accompanied by their
95 % confidence intervals (dashed lines) over the
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range from 50 to 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Data from Lea and Boyle (1989) are plotted additionally for comparison.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average (large, darker shaded circles) and single-chamber
measurement (lighter circles) Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, expressed as their
deviation from the mean shell Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> (left) and <italic>H. depressa</italic>. Error bars represent the standard
deviation of the mean; the dashed lines in the right panel indicate the
95 % confidence intervals for the linear regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Barium incorporation</title>
      <p>Calcite Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca increases linearly with seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca for both species
(Fig. 2, Table 2). ANOVA performed on the individual data points combined
with regression analyses reveals a significant increase in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for both species (Table 3). Calculated regression slopes result
in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.326 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.005) for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and 0.777 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007) for
<italic>H. depressa</italic> (Fig. 3, solid lines). Regression lines are forced
through zero as it seems reasonable to assume that no Ba is incorporated
into calcite when the Ba concentration in the seawater is zero. Without this
forcing, regression slopes would be Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asw</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">asw</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>H. depressa</italic>. The resulting
partition coefficients ((Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/(Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are constant and
significantly different between the species (ANOVA) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 for
<italic>A. lessonii</italic> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 for <italic>H. depressa</italic>) over the range of seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca studied
here. The regression line for Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<italic>A. lessonii</italic> corresponds well with that reported for a number of different low-Mg
species (Lea and Boyle, 1989).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Measured Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and
<italic>H. depressa</italic> for each treatment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>A. lessonii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">89.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>H. depressa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">135</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">123</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">168</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">177</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameters of the regression analysis and ANOVA tests for
significance of the regression. Both average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
each experimental condition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and all chamber-specific
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">133</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">179</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratios were tested versus the Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
of the five treatments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="center"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Regression</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">ANOVA </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">analysis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>H. depressa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">133</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">940</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>A. lessonii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">179</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">227</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>H. depressa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">247</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>A. lessonii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.011</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The aquarium-derived specimens (aquarium samples) had a diameter ranging
from 550 to 1180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (with an average of 975 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and from
1380 to 2340 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (average: 1936 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) for <italic>H. depressa</italic>. They had an average
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of 15.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 SD) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and 35.7
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 SD) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>H. depressa</italic>. In combination with the measured aquarium's seawater
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of 35.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 SD) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the partition coefficients
for Ba vary between 0.43 and 1.0 for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and <italic>H. depressa</italic>, respectively. The aquarium-derived data are consistent with the controlled-growth-derived data, but they
were not used in the regression analysis (Fig. 2) since the conditions
(e.g., carbonate chemistry) under which the specimens from the aquarium were
grown were not determined as precisely and accurately as in our culturing
experiment. Including these data in the linear regression (Fig. 2) would
change the sensitivity from 0.78 to 0.77 for <italic>H. depressa</italic> and from 0.33 to 0.32 for <italic>A. lessonii</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Intrachamber variability in Ba\,$/$\,Ca}?><title>Intrachamber variability in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca</title>
      <p>From both species, 10 specimens were used to quantify the relation between
ontogeny (i.e., size-dependent) and Ba incorporation into foraminiferal
calcite. For this purpose, the final 6–7 chambers of these individuals were
ablated (Fig. 3). With the selected spot diameter (80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), ablation
of a small amount of material of adjacent chambers could not always be
avoided. Some chamber walls, particularly of the youngest (i.e., built
latest) chambers, were too thin for reliable measurements and were excluded
from further consideration.</p>
      <p>Since these specimens were cultured at different Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, the
interchamber variability is expressed as the difference of a single-chamber
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and the individual's average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Positive single-chamber values
indicate higher-than-average values, whereas negative values indicate
single-chamber Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca below that individual's average Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
(Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relation between the Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (left panel) and the partition coefficients for Ba and Mg
(right panel). Every dot represents one single-chamber measurement. The data
for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> are indicated by circles; those for <italic>H. depressa</italic> are represented by open diamonds. Every treatment (A–E, Table 1)
is indicated by a separate color.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In <italic>H. depressa</italic>, Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases significantly with subsequently new chambers
added (Fig. 3). Regression analysis reveals an average increase of 1.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with every chamber added (Table 4).
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to decrease with chamber position in <italic>A. lessonii</italic>, although the
ANOVA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value shows that this is statistically not significant. Still,
removing one single outlier already results in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value lower than 0.01,
indicating that the current data set does not allow the rejection of the presence
of a trend for <italic>A. lessonii</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Relation between incorporation of barium and magnesium</title>
      <p>Combining data from all five treatments, average Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of <italic>A. lessonii</italic> was 64 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a relative standard deviation of
47 %. Within treatments, the variability in Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is considerably
lower (between 27 and 37 %). Average Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in <italic>H. depressa</italic>
was 152 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a standard deviation of 25 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(16 %). Within treatments, the relative standard deviation ranged from
4.1 % (treatment E) to 17 % (treatment D). The species-specific
single-chamber Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios combined for all treatments are
positively and significantly related (Fig. 4). For <italic>A. lessonii</italic>,
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.2,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 for the slope of the regression) and for <italic>H. depressa</italic>, Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 92
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 for the slope). The slopes of
these two regressions (3.1 and 1.1) are significantly different: this is
calculated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Heterostegina</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Amphistegina</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>√</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Heterostegina</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Heterostegina</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value for the
regression's slope and SE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the slope's associated standard error. For
the slopes of the Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca–Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca regressions for
<italic>Amphistegina</italic> and <italic>Heterostegina</italic>, the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> score is
higher than &gt; 7, indicating that the two slopes are significantly
different.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p>ANOVA parameters of single-chamber measurements.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ANOVA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>A. lessonii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>A. lessonii</italic> (F-1 and F-2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.744</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>H. depressa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt;0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>When comparing the single-chamber <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all data
combined, the partition coefficient for Mg is over 30 times lower than that
of Ba (Fig. 4). Over the range in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> studied here, the
relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is linear within both species. For
<italic>A. lessonii</italic>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 for the
slope of the regression) and for <italic>H. depressa</italic>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 for the slope). The slopes of these two regressions
(40 and 29) are not significantly different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> score 1.6). When combining
the data from both species, the regression equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.073</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29.9, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 for the slope).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Test diameter increase</title>
      <p>The range of Ba concentrations used in the experiments did not influence the
increase in shell diameter of either foraminiferal species (Fig. 1).
Compared to <italic>H. depressa</italic>,  increases in shell diameter (which is proportional to the
chamber addition rate) for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> were slightly more variable. To prevent barite
precipitation it was necessary to reduce the sulphate concentration below
that typically measured in natural seawater. Sulphate concentrations between
0.1 and 1 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> do not affect inorganic calcite growth (Reddy and
Nancollas, 1976), but a decrease in growth rates of approximately 30 % was
observed in coccolithophores growing in artificial seawater with a sulphate
concentration 10 % that of natural seawater (Langer et al., 2009).
Although coccolithophores and foraminifera may respond differently to
lowered sulphate concentrations, this reduction could have hampered growth
of the specimens in our culturing experiment. Chamber addition rates of <italic>A. lessonii</italic> in
a culture setup with sulphate concentrations similar to those of natural
seawater (Mewes et al., 2014) were approximately 20 % higher than chamber
addition rates observed in our experiments. Since these experiments were not
performed simultaneously using specimens from the same batch, it is not
straightforward to compare absolute rates and therefore the 20 %
difference cannot unambiguously be attributed to sulphate concentration
(Hoppe et al., 2011). Unfortunately no data exist on the effect of reduced
sulphate concentrations on the uptake of trace elements in foraminiferal
calcite. However, Langer et al. (2009) demonstrated that sulphate
limitation had no discernible effect on Ba incorporation in coccolithophore
calcite.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Partition coefficients for Li, B, Na, Mg, Sr and Ba for two groups
of foraminifera (large benthic foraminifera <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Miliolids and the low-Mg
species). Data on which the average partition coefficients are based are
listed in the Supplement. The ranges indicate the maximum range in published
partition coefficients. The linear regression between the partition
coefficients for these two groups is described by:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>plankton/low-Mg benthic</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3992</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>miliolid/LBF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0081</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Elemental results for Miliolid species are confined to Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
and Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Li <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios were taken from Delaney et al. (1985),
Hall and Chan (2004a), Marriott et al. (2004), Yu et al. (2005), Ni et
al. (2007), Bryan and Marchitto (2008), Hathorne et al. (2009), Dawber and
Tripati (2012), and Evans et al. (2015); B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are from Yu et
al. (2005), Yu and Elderfield (2007), Foster (2008), Hendry et al. (2009),
Allen et al. (2011, 2012), Dawber and Tripati (2012), Babila et al. (2014),
and Kaczmarek et al. (2015); Na <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are from Delaney et
al. (1985), Ni et al. (2007), Bian and Martin (2010), Wit et al. (2013) and
Evans et al. (2015); Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are from Toyofuku et al. (2000), Raja
et al. (2005), Yu et al. (2005), Elderfield et al. (2006), Segev and
Erez (2006), Hendry et al. (2009), Dueñas-Bohórquez et al. (2009,
2011), Dawber and Tripati (2012), Wit et al. (2012, 2013), Babila et
al. (2014), De Nooijer et al. (2014a), Sadekov et al. (2014), and Evans et
al. (2015). Foraminiferal Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are taken from Raja et
al. (2005), Yu et al. (2005), Hendry et al. (2009), Dueñas-Bohórquez
et al. (2009, 2011), Dawber and Tripati (2012), Wit et al. (2013), De Nooijer
et al. (2014a), and Evans et al. (2015). Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios are from this
study, Lea and Boyle (1989, 1991), Lea and Spero (1994), Hall and
Chan (2004b), Ni et al. (2007), Hönisch et al. (2011), and Evans et
al. (2015).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/3387/2017/bg-14-3387-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Barium incorporation</title>
      <p>The variability in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca between individual ablation craters is
considerable, but the average foraminiferal Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca shows a consistent
relation with seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. This implies that the observed variability is
a reflection of the inhomogeneous distribution in the test and is hence
filtered out when averaging. This is similar to the behavior for Mg and Sr
(Sadekov et al., 2008; Wit et al., 2012; De Nooijer et al., 2014a) and
underscores the power of single-chamber analyses. If present, inhomogeneity
in test wall Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in combination with different cross sections sampled
during the ablation potentially account for the observed variability. This
would imply that although large differences are observed within a test wall,
the average still reliably reflects seawater concentration (this paper) and
for Mg, still reflects seawater temperature (Hathorne et al., 2009).
Comparing within-specimen and between-specimen variability, De Nooijer et
al. (2014a) showed that within-specimen variability does not account for all
of the observed variability in Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in <italic>Ammonia tepida</italic>. This seems to be similar for Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
(compare Fig. 4 in this paper with Fig. 5 from De Nooijer et al.,
2014a), which would mean that at least 20 chambers need to be analyzed to
reach a 5 % relative precision (De Nooijer et al., 2014a). This is not
limited by the analytical precision, but rather is due to inherent biological
interchamber and interspecimen variability. To reduce ontogenetic
variability (in, for example, paleoceanographic applications where complete specimens
are measured), a narrow size fraction should be analyzed.</p>
      <p>Incorporation of Ba in <italic>H. depressa</italic> shows a partitioning that is
about 2.5 times higher than in <italic>A. lessonii</italic>. Such a large offset of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between benthic species fits previously reported (differences
in) partition coefficients for Ba. Lea and Boyle (1989) found
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi</italic>,
<italic>Cibicidoides kullenbergi</italic> and <italic>Uvigerina</italic> spp. for a series of
core tops, comparable to the partition coefficient reported here for
<italic>A. lessonii</italic> (0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.022, Fig. 2). In contrast, partition
coefficients for Ba in planktonic foraminifera are roughly only twice as low
as these benthic foraminiferal partitioning coefficients (0.14–0.19;
Hönisch et al., 2011; Lea and Boyle, 1991; Lea and Spero, 1992). Although
temperature, pH, salinity and pressure were initially proposed as potential
explanations for the offset between planktonic and benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Lea and Boyle, 1991; Lea and Spero, 1992), studies by Lea and Spero (1994)
and Hönisch et al. (2011) showed no significant impact of temperature, pH
and salinity on Ba incorporation into planktonic foraminiferal calcite. This
would leave hydrostatic pressure to explain the difference between benthic
and planktonic species. Conversely, van Dijk et al. (2017) showed that
in a number of larger benthic foraminifera, Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is positively
influenced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our observations show, however, that the observed
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between <italic>H. depressa</italic> and <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and also the offset with the planktonic species are inherent to
these species. A small impact of environmental parameters other than seawater
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca may account for the slightly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
foraminifera taken from the aquarium compared to the cultured ones (Fig. 2).
The overall differences in partitioning seem to coincide with different
taxonomic groups, which may indicate that foraminifera may differ in their
controls on transporting ions from seawater to the site of calcification. For
example, the contribution of transmembrane transport versus that of seawater
transport (i.e., leakage, Nehrke et al., 2013, or vacuolization, Erez, 2003)
may vary between species and thereby account for differences in Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca,
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, and so forth (Nehrke et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Interchamber variability of Ba\,$/$\,Ca${}_{\mathrm{cc}}$}?><title>Interchamber variability of Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>In both species cultured here, Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases
significantly from the largest (i.e., built latest in life) towards the smaller
chambers (Fig. 3). Observed trends were not significantly different between
<italic>A. lessonii</italic> and <italic>H. depressa</italic>, suggesting that
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases at the same rate with size, despite the
overall difference in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3). Since we always
analyzed chambers at the same position (F-1 for <italic>A. lessonii</italic> and F-2
for <italic>H. depressa</italic>) and since the final size of the cultured specimens
was similar between treatments (Fig. 1), ontogenetic trends in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca do
not influence the trends in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca between treatments (Fig. 2). Several
other studies showed that element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios can vary with chamber
position. Raitzsch et al. (2011), for example, reported increasing B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
and decreasing Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca towards younger chambers in the benthic
<italic>Planulina wuellerstorfi</italic>. Such patterns may be related to changes in
the surface-to-volume ratio or relative changes in vital effects as
foraminifera grow larger. For example, pH reduction in the foraminiferal
microenvironment is related to the specimen's size (Glas et al., 2012) and
may thereby affect the chemical speciation of minor and trace element, which
in turn, may determine their uptake rates. Hönisch et al. (2011),
however, showed that seawater pH has no noticeable effect on Ba incorporation
in planktonic foraminiferal calcite, rendering changes in the pH of the
foraminiferal microenvironment an unlikely explanation to account for the
observed chamber-to-chamber variability in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Alternatively,
changes in the metabolic rate, the instantaneous calcification rate or a
different partitioning between the impacts of the life processes may lead to
the observed ontogenetic trend.</p>
      <p>Bentov and Erez (2006) argued that decreasing Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca with foraminifera
test size could be explained by relatively high Mg concentrations at or near
the primary organic sheet (POS), which is the organic matrix on which the
first layer of calcite precipitates during the formation of a new chamber.
With the formation of a new chamber, a low-Mg calcite layer is deposited over
all existing chambers, so that the high-Mg phase is diluted as more
layers are deposited (Bentov and Erez, 2006). Future studies may indicate
whether Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is also heterogeneously distributed within chamber walls,
by, for example, being enriched close to the POS (Kunioka et al., 2006). If
this is the case, lamellar calcification mode may also result in changing
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca with chamber position.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Coupled incorporation of barium and magnesium</title>
      <p>If incorporation of Ba and Mg (and Na, Sr and B) are physically linked
during biomineralization, interspecies differences in composition may
likely be correlated across the various elements. The correlation between
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca within and between species (Fig. 4) suggests that these
two elements are simultaneously affected during their incorporation. The
relationship between Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca is different between the two species,
which may be (partly) caused by the variability in seawater chemistry
between treatments (i.e., seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca; Table 1). Alternatively,
incorporation of Mg in <italic>H. depressa</italic> may be close to the maximum concentration of Mg
that can be incorporated into a calcite crystal lattice at ambient
conditions (Morse et al., 2007). This may result in an overall asymptotic
relationship between Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca as Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca approaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p>When correcting for the different seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
between treatments, incorporated Ba and Mg correlate similarly within as well
as between the two species studied here (Fig. 4). This suggests that these
elements are coupled during biomineralization itself and that the ratio of Ba
and Mg in seawater is preserved during calcification by these species of
foraminifera. When comparing the relation between Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
from other benthic species (e.g., Lea and Boyle, 1989, Fig. 2; Lea and Spero,
1994; Hönisch et al., 2011; Evans et al., 2015), the coupling between Ba
and Mg incorporation is likely similar across a wide range of benthic
foraminiferal species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Biomineralization and element incorporation</title>
      <p>Foraminiferal biomineralization determines the incorporation of many elements
and fractionation of many isotopes during the production of new chambers, as
indicated by overall large compositional differences between inorganically
precipitated and foraminiferal calcite (Erez, 2003; Bentov and Erez, 2006;
Nehrke et al., 2013; De Nooijer et al., 2014b). For example, Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios in
many species are orders of magnitude lower than what is expected from
inorganic precipitation experiments. Additionally, Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca varies considerably
between foraminiferal species and especially between species known to have
different calcification strategies (Bentov and Erez, 2006; Toyofuku et al.,
2011; Wit et al., 2012; De Nooijer et al., 2009, 2014b). Other elements such
as Sr (e.g., Elderfield et al., 2000) and B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (e.g., Allen et al., 2012) also
vary significantly between species. Generally, concentrations for these
elements correlate within taxa and hence species incorporating relatively
much Mg also have high (for example) Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Na <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca. Miliolids and
many large benthic foraminifera (LBF) produce calcite with Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of up to
100–150 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Toyofuku et al., 2000; Dueñas-Bohórquez et al.,
2011; Sadekov et al., 2014; Evans et al., 2015), while most planktonic and
symbiont-barren benthic foraminifera produce test calcite with Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca values
ranging from 1 to 10 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Nürnberg et al., 1996; Elderfield et
al., 2002; Lear et al., 2010; Wit et al., 2012; De Nooijer et al., 2014b).
The same distinction is observed for B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (compare, for example, Allen et al.,
2012,
and Kazcmarek et al., 2015), Li <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (Lear et al., 2010, versus Evans et al.,
2015), Na <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (Wit et al., 2013, versus Evans et al., 2015) and Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
(e.g.,
Dueñas-Bohórquez et al., 2011). The correlation between relatively
high (for example) Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca corresponds to the observed trends
in the data presented here for Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in <italic>H. depressa</italic> and <italic>A. lessonii</italic> (Fig. 4). The
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in the former species is approximately 2.5 times that of the latter,
which is similar to the difference observed in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios between these
species and implies that Ba changes in concert with Mg, which is consistent
with the single-chamber correlation between Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (Fig. 4). Such
a change could potentially be caused inorganically by differences in Mg
opening up the crystal lattice in such a way that it can accommodate more or
less Ba. Such a mechanism is described for Mg and Sr (e.g., Morse and Bender,
1990; Mucci and Morse, 1983; Mewes et al., 2015; Langer et al., 2016) and
may also apply to Ba incorporation and the influence of Mg ions that
increase stress in the calcite crystal lattice. Unless the strain of
incorporated Mg ions does not increase linearly with its concentration, the
covariance between Mg and in this case Ba may well be interrelated during an
earlier stage of the biomineralization process, e.g., during their transport
from the surrounding seawater into the site of calcification (Erez, 2003; De
Nooijer et al., 2014b).</p>
      <p>Interestingly, the partitioning of different elements is not the same between
taxa. For example, Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in LBF is approximately twice as high
(Dueñas-Bohorquez et al., 2011; Evans et al., 2015) as in planktonic
species (Elderfield et al., 2002; Dueñas-Bohórquez et al., 2009;
Hendry et al., 2009), whereas the ratio between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of these
groups is between 10 and 100 (see above). Comparing the offset of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between
groups as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> itself shows an approximate logarithmic
correlation (Fig. 5). The distinction between the two groups on the basis of
their element signature coincides with known differences in biomineralization
controls. Element controls in low-Mg species are thought to be determined by
(highly) selective trans-membrane ion transporters, (limited) leakage of
seawater into the site of calcification and/or selective Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> removal
(Nehrke et al., 2013; De Nooijer et al., 2014b; Toyofuku et al., 2017).
Miliolid foraminifera belong to the high-Mg foraminiferal group and are known
to secrete their calcite within vesicles that are hypothesized to contain
seawater, which may be modified after endocytosis (Hemleben et al., 1986; Ter
Kuile and Erez, 1991; De Nooijer et al., 2009). These intracellular vesicles
may therefore contain relatively high concentrations of Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ba<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and other ions present in seawater, although so far mainly Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of Miliolid foraminifera have been published (Supplement). The
biomineralization of non-Miliolid, intermediate- and high-Mg benthic
foraminifera may employ characteristics of both these types of calcification
and therefore incorporate moderate to high concentrations of elements (see
Segev and Erez, 2006).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Results from this study indicate that differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
species of foraminifera can be relatively large. This implies that
species-specific Ba partition coefficients need to be applied to reconstruct
past Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or salinity (Lea and Boyle, 1989; Weldeab et al.,
2007; Hoffmann et al., 2014; Evans et al., 2015). Moreover, our results
underscore the necessity to account for size-related effects on
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This effect may bias obtained Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particularly when
using single-chamber measurements. When determining Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
dissolution of whole shells, the contribution of smaller chambers (with
lower Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively small compared to a specimen's overall
Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and thus does not affect average values. Our results also show that
within species as well as between species, single-chambered Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
are linearly correlated. The difference in Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca between the two species
studied here fits with previously observed variability in element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios
between foraminifera taxa and likely reflects differences in their
biomineralization mechanisms.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data on which this publication is based, can be found
through the following DOI:
<uri>https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:d4b44881-16d7-4ada-bd09-85bce081bc84</uri>
(De Nooijer, 2017).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3387-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3387-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Helen de Waard for the chemical analyses. This work is
supported by the Gravitation grant NESSC from the Dutch Ministry of Education,
Culture and Science.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Hiroshi Kitazato<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allen, K. A., Hönisch, B., Eggins, S. M., Yu, J., Spero, H. J., and
Elderfield, H.: Controls on Boron incorporation in cultured tests of the
planktic foraminifer <italic>Orbulina universa</italic>, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
309, 291–301, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allen, K. A., Hönisch, B., Eggins, S. M., and Rosenthal, Y.:
Environmental controls on B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in calcite tests of the tropical
planktic foraminifer species <italic>Globigerinoides ruber</italic> and
<italic>Globigerinoides sacculifer</italic>, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 351–352,
270–280, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Babila, T. L., Rosenthal, Y., and Conte, M. H.: Evaluation of the
biogeochemical controls on B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca of <italic>Globigerinoides ruber</italic> from
the Ocean Flux Program, Bermuda, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 404, 67–76, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bahr, A., Schönfeld, J., Hoffmann, J., Voigt, S., Aurahs, R., Kucera, M.,
Slögel, S., Jentzen, A., and Gerdes, A.: Comparison of Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>18Owater as freshwater proxies: A multi-species core-top study on
planktonic foraminifera from the vicinity of the Orinoco River mouth, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 383, 45–57, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bentov, S. and Erez, J.: Impact of biomineralization processes on the Mg
content of foraminiferal shells: A biological perspective, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 7, Q01P08, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC001015</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bian, N. and Martin, P. A.: Investigating the fidelity of Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and
other element data from reductively cleaned planktonic foraminifera,
Paleoceanography 25, PA2215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009PA001796</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, E. A.: Cadmium, zinc, copper and barium in foraminifera tests, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 53, 11–35, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, A. L., Brewer, P. G., Shafer, D. K., and Williams, R. T.:
Measurements of total carbon dioxide and alkalinity by potentiometric
titration in the GEOSECS program, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 55, 99–115, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S. and Peng T.-H.: Tracers in the Sea, Eldigo Press,
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Palisades, New York, USA, 690 pp.,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bryan, S. P. and Marchitto, T. M.: Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca-temperature proxy in benthic
foraminifera: New calibrations from the Florida Straits and a hypothesis
regarding Mg/Li, Paleoceonography, 23, PA2220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007PA001553</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, L. H., Drummond, D., Edmond, J. M., and Grant, B.: On the barium data
from the Atlantic GEOSECS expedition, Deep-Sea Res., 24, 613–649, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dawber, C. F. and Tripati, A.: Relationships between bottom water carbonate
saturation and element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios in coretop samples of the benthic
foraminifera <italic>Oridorsalis umbonatus</italic>, Biogeosciences, 9, 3029–3045,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3029-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3029-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Delaney, M. L., Bé, A. W. H., and Boyle E. A.: Li, Sr, Mg and Na in
foraminiferal clacite shells from laboratory culture, sediment traps, and
sediment cores, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 1327–1341, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>De Nooijer, L. J.: Data presented in the paper “Ba incorporation in benthic
foraminifera”, 4TU,
<uri>https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:d4b44881-16d7-4ada-bd09-85bce081bc84</uri>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J., Toyofuku, T., and Kitazato, H.: Foraminifera promote
calcification by elevating their intracellular pH, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
106, 15374–15378, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>De Nooijer, L. J., Hathorne, E. C., Reichart, G. J., Langer, G., and Bijma,
J.: Variability in calcitic Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios in clones of
the benthic foraminifer <italic>Ammonia tepida</italic>, Mar. Micropaleontol., 107,
33–43, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J., Spero, H. J., Erez, J., Bijma, J., and Reichart, G. J.:
Biomineralization in perforate foraminifera, Earth-Sci. Rev., 135, 48–58,
2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dickson, A. G. and Millero, F. J.: A comparison of the equilibrium constants
for dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater media, Deep-Sea Res.,
34, 1733–1743, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Da Rocha, R., Kuroyanagi, A., Bijma, J., and
Reichart, G. J.: Effect of salinity and seawater calcite saturation state on
Mg and Sr incorporation in cultured planktonic foraminifera, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 73, 178–189, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Raitzsch, M., De Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart,
G. J.: Independent impacts of calcium and carbonate ion concentration on Mg
and Sr incorporation in cultured benthic foraminifera, Mar. Micropaleontol.,
81, 122–130, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Eggins, S., De Deckker, P., and Marshall, J.: Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca variation in
plaktonic foraminifera tests: implications for reconstructing palaeo-seawater
temperature and habitat migration, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 212, 291–306,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H., Cooper, M., and Ganssen, G.: Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in multiple species
of planktonic foraminifera: Implications for reconstructions of seawater
Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 1, GC000031,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GC000031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GC000031</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H., Vautravers, M., and Cooper, M.: The relationship between
shell size and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>18O, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>13C of
species of planktonic foraminifera, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 3, GC000194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GC000194</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H., Yu, J., Anand, P., Kiefer, T., and Nyland, B.: Calibrations
for benthic foraminiferal Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca paleothermometry and the carbonate ion
hypothesis, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 250, 633–649, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Erez, J.: The source of ions for biomineralization in foraminifera and their
implications for paleoceanographic proxies, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 54,
115–149, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Evans, D., Erez, J., Oron, S., and Müller, W.: Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca-temperature
and seawater-test chemistry relationships in the shallow-dwelling large
benthic foraminifera <italic>Operculina ammonoides</italic>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
148, 325–342, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Foster, G. L.: Seawater pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and [CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] variations in the
Caribbean Sea over the last 130 kyr: A boron isotope and B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca study of
planktonic foraminifera, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 271, 254–266, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Glas, M. S., Langer, G., and Keul, N.: Calcification acidifies the
microenvironment of a benthic foraminifer (<italic>Ammonia</italic> sp.), J. Exp.
Mar. Biol. Ecol., 424–425, 53–58, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gran, G.: Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations
– Part II, The Analyst, 77, 661–671, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Guay, C. K. and Falkner, K. K.: Barium as a tracer of Arctic halocline and
river waters, Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 44, 1543–1569, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Guay, C. K. and Falkner, K. K.: A survey of dissolved barium in the estuaries
of major Arctic rivers and adjacent seas, Cont. Shelf Res., 18, 859–882,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Guillong, M., Meier, D. L., Allan, M. M., Heinrich, C. A., and Yardley, B. W.
D.: SILLS: A MATLAB-based program for the reduction of laser ablation ICP-MS
data of homogeneous materials and inclusions, Mineralogical Association of
Canada Short Course, 40, 328–333, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hall, J. M. and Chan, L.-H.: Li <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in multiple species of benthic and
planktonic foraminifera: Thermocline, latitudinal, and glacial-interglacial
variation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 529–545, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hall, J. M. and Chan, L.-H.: Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in <italic>Neogloboquadrina pachyderma</italic> as an indicator of deglacial meltwater discharge into the western
Arctic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 19, PA000910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003PA000910</ext-link>,
2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hanor, J. S. and Chan, L.-H.: Non-conservative behavior of barium during
mixing of Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico waters, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 37, 242–250, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hatch, M. B. A., Schellenberg, S. A., and Carter, M. L.: Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
variations in the modern intertidal bean clam Donax gouldii: An upwelling
proxy?, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol., 373, 98–107, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hathorne, E. C., James, R. H., Savage, P., and Alard, O.: Physical and
chemical characteristics of particles produced by laser ablation of biogenic
calcium carbonate, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 23, 240–243, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hathorne, E. C., James, R. H., and Lampitt, R. S.: Environmental versus
biomineralization controls on the intratest variation in the trace element
composition of the planktonic foraminifera <italic>G. inflata</italic> and <italic>G. scitula</italic>, Paleoceanography, 24, PA001742, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009PA001742</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hemleben, C., Anderson, O. R., Berthold, W., and Spindler, M.: Calcification
and chamber formation in foraminifera – an overview, in: Biomineralization
in lower plants and animals, edited by: Leadbeater, B. S. C. and Riding, R.,
The Systematics Society, London, UK, 237–249, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Hendry, K. R., Rickaby, R. E. M., Meredith, M. P., and Elderfield, H.:
Controls on stable isotope and trace metal uptake in <italic>Neogloboquadrina pachyderma</italic> (sinistral) from an Antarctic sea-ice environment, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 278, 67–77, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, J., Bahr, A., Voigt, S., Schönfeld, J., Nürnberg, D., and
Rethemeyer, J.: Disentangling abrupt deglacial hydrological changes in
northern South America: Insolation versus oceanic forcing, Geology, 42,
579–582, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hönisch, B., Allen, K. A., Russell, A. D., Eggins, S. M., Bijma, J.,
Spero, H. J., Lea, D. W., and Yu, J.: Planktic foraminifers as recorders of
seawater Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Mar. Micropaleontol., 79, 52–57, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. J. M., Langer, G., and Rost, B.: <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> shows
identical responses to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in TA and DIC manipulations, J.
Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 406, 54–62, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jochum, K. P., Weis, U., Stoll, B., Kuzmin, D., Yang, Q., Raczek, I., Jacob,
D. E., Stracke, A., Birbaum, K., Frick, D. A., Günther, D., and
Enzweiler, J.: Determiniation of reference values for NIST SRM 610–617
glasses following ISO guidelines, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 35, 397–429,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kaczmarek, K., Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Horn, I., Misra, S., Janse, M., and
Bijma, J.: Boron incorporation in the foraminifer Amphistegina lessonii under
a decoupled carbonate chemistry, Biogeosciences, 12, 1753–1763,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1753-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-1753-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kester, D. R., Duedall, I. W., and Connors, D. N.: Preparation of artificial
seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 176–179, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kunioka, D., Shirai, K., Takahata, N., Sano, Y., Toyofuku, T., and Ujiie, Y.:
Microdistribution of Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, and Ba <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios in
<italic>Pulleniatina obliquiloculata</italic> test by using a NanoSIMS: Implication
for the vital effect mechanism, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, GC001280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001280</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Thoms, S., and Stoll, H.: Barium partitioning in
coccoliths of <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73,
2899–2906, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Langer, G., Sadekov, A., Thoms, S., Keul, N., Nehrke, G., Mewes, A., Greaves,
M., Misra, S., Reichart, G. J., De Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Elderfield,
H.: Sr partitioning in the benthic foraminifera <italic>Ammonia aomoriensis</italic>
and <italic>Amphistegina lessonii</italic>, Chem. Geol., 440, 306–312, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. and Boyle, E.: Barium content of benthic foraminifera controlled by
bottom-water composition, Nature, 338, 751–753, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W.: A trace metal perspective on the evolution of Antarctic
circumpolar deepwater chemistry, Paleoceanography, 10, 733–747, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: A 210 000-year record of barium variability in
the deep northwest Atlantic Ocean, Nature, 347, 269–272, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: Barium in planktonic foraminifera, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 55, 3321–3331, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: Determination of carbonate-bound barium in
foraminifera and corals by isotope dilution plasma-mass spectrometry, Chem.
Geol., 103, 73–84, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Lea, D. W. and Spero, H. J.: Experimental determination of barium uptake in
shells of the planktonic foraminifera <italic>Orbulina universa</italic> at
22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 2673–2680, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Spero, H. J.: Assessing the reliability of paleochemical
tracers: Barium uptake in the shells of planktonic foraminifera,
Paleoceanography, 9, 445–452, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W., Shen, G. T., and Boyle, E. A.: Coralline barium records temporal
variability in equatorial Pacific upwelling, Nature, 340, 373–376, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Lear, C. H., Mawbey, E. M., and Rosenthal, Y.: Cenozoic benthic foraminiferal
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Li <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca records: Toward unlocking temperatures and
saturation states, Paleoceanography, 25, PA001880,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009PA001880</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. J.: Algal symbiosis in larger foraminifera, Symbiosis, 42, 63–75,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y.-H. and Chan, L.-H.: Desorption of Ba and 226Ra from river-borne
sediments in the Hudson Estuary, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 37, 242–250, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Marr, J. P., Carter, L., Bostock, H. C., Bolton, A., and Smith, E.: Southwest
Pacific Ocean response to a warming world: Using Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Zn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca,
and Mn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in foraminifera to track surface ocean water masses during
the last deglaciation, Paleoceanography, 28, 347–362, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Marriott, C. S., Henderson, G. M., Crompton, R., Staubwasser, M., and Shaw,
S.: Effect of mineralogy, salinity, and temperature on Li <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and Li
isotope composition of calcium carbonate, Chem. Geol., 212, 5–15, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E., and Pytkowicz, R. N.:
Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in
seawater at atmospheric pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Mewes, A., Langer, G., De Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Reichart, G. J.:
Effect of different seawater Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations on calcification in two
benthic foraminifers, Mar. Micropaleontol., 113, 56–64, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, A., Langer, G., Reichart, G. J., De Nooijer, L. J., Nehrke, G., and
Bijma, J.: The impact of Mg contents on Sr partitioning in benthic
foraminifers, Chem. Geol., 412, 92–98, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Morse, J. W. and Bender, M. L.: Partition coefficients in calcite:
Examination of factors influencing the validity of experimental results and
their application to natural systems, Chem. Geol., 82, 265–277, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Morse, J. W., Arvidson, R. S., and Lüttge, A.: Calcium carbonate
formation and dissolution, Chem. Rev., 107, 342–381, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Mucci, A. and Morse, J. W.: The incorporation of Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Sr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> into
calcite overgrowths: influences of growth rate and solution composition,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 47, 217–233, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Nehrke, G., Keul, N., Langer, G., de Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Meibom,
A.: A new model for biomineralization and trace-element signatures of
Foraminifera tests, Biogeosciences, 10, 6759–6767,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6759-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6759-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Ni, Y., Foster, G. L., Bailey, T., Elliott, T., Schmidt, D. N., Pearson, P.,
Haley, B., and Coath, C.: A core top assessment of proxies for the ocean
carbonate system in surface-dwelling foraminifera, Paleoceanography, 22,
PA3212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001337</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Ni Flaithearta, S., Reichart, G. J., Jorissen, F. J., Fontanier, C., Rohling,
E. J., Thomson, J., and De Lange, G.: Reconstructing the seafloor environment
during sapropel formation using benthic foraminiferal trace metals, stable
isotopes, and sediment composition, Paleoceanography, 25, PA4225,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009PA001869</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Nürnberg, D., Bijma, J., and Hemleben, C.: Assessing the reliability of
magnesium in foraminiferal calcite as a proxy for water mass temperatures,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 80, 803–814, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Okai, T., Suzuki, A., Kawahata, H., Terashima, S., and Imai, N.: Preparation
of a New Geological Survey of Japan Geochemical Reference Material: Coral
JCp-1, Geostandard. Newslett., 26, 95–99, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Pak, D. K., Lea, D. W., and Kennett, J. P.: Seasonal and interannual
variation in Santa Barbara Basin water temperatures observed in sediment trap
foraminiferal Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q12008,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GC000760</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Pierrot, D., Lewis, E., and Wallace, D. W. R.: MS Excel program developed for
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system calculations. ORNL/CDIAC-105. Carbon dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US department of Energy, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, USA, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Raitzsch, M., Hathorne, E. C., Kuhnert H., Groeneveld, J., and Bickert, T.:
Modern and late Pleistocene B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios of the benthic foraminifer
<italic>Planulina wuellerstorfi </italic>determined with laser ablation ICP-MS,
Geology, 39, 1039–1042, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Raja, R., Saraswati, P. K., Rogers, K., and Iwao, K.: Magnesium and strontium
compositions of recent symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 58, 31–44, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, M. M. and Nancollas, G. H.: The crystallization of calcium carbonate:
IV. The effect of magnesium, strontium and sulfate ions, J. Crystal Growth,
35, 33–38, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Reichart, G. J., Jorissen, F., Anschutz, P., and Mason, P. R. D.: Single
foraminiferal test chemistry records the marine environment, Geology, 31,
355–358, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Rubin, S. I., King, S. L., Jahnke, R. A., and Froelich, P. N.: Benthic barium
and alkalinity fluxes: Is Ba an oceanic paleo-alkalinity proxy for glacial
atmosphere CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>?, Geophy. Res. Lett., 30, 1885,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017339</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Sadekov, A., Eggins, S. M., De Deckker, P., and Kroon, D.: Uncertainties in
seawater thermometry deriving from intratest and intertest Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
variability in <italic>Globigerinoides ruber</italic>, Paleoceanography, 23,
PA0014502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007PA001452</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Sadekov, A., Bush, F., Kerr, J., Ganeshram, R., and Elderfield, H.:
Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca composition of benthic foraminifera <italic>Miliolacea </italic>as a new
tool of paleoceanography, Paleoceanography, 29, 990–1001, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Segev, E. and Erez, J.: Effect of Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratio in seawater on shell
composition in shallow benthic foraminifera, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7,
GC000969, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC000969</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Ter Kuile, B. H. and Erez, J.: Carbon budgets for two species of benthonic
symbiont-bearing foraminifera, Biol. Bull., 180, 489–495, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Toyofuku, T., Kitazato, H., and Kawahata, H.: Evaluation of Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca
thermometry in foraminifera: Comparison of experimental results and
measurements in nature, Paleoceanography, 15, 456–464, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Toyofuku, T., Suzuki, M., Suga, H., Sakai, S., Suzuki, A., Ishikawa, T., De
Nooijer, L. J., Schiebel, R., Kawahata, H., and Kitazato, H.: Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the brackish shallow-water benthic foraminifer
<italic>Ammonia “beccarii”</italic>, Mar. Micropaleontol., 78, 113–120, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Toyofuku, T., Matsuo, M. Y., De Nooijer, L. J., Nagai, Y., Kawada, S.,
Fujita, K., Reichart, G.-J., Nomaki, H., Tsuchiya, M., Sakaguchi, H., and
Kitazato, H.: Proton pumping accompanies calcification in foraminifera, Nat.
Commun., 8, 14145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms14145</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, I., de Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Trends in element
incorporation in hyaline and porcelaneous foraminifera as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biogeosciences, 14, 497–510,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-497-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-497-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Weldeab, S., Lea, D. W., Schneider, R. R., and Andersen, N.: 155 000 years
of west African monsoon and ocean thermal evolution, Science, 316,
1303–1307, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Weldeab, S., Lea, D. W., Oberhänsli, H., and Schneider, R. R.: Links
between southwestern tropical Indian Ocean SST and precipitation over
southeastern Africa over the last 17 kyr, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol.
Palaeoecol., 410, 200–212, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, S. A., Koenig, A. E., and Orklid, R.: Development of microanalytical
reference material (MACS-3) for LA-ICP-MS analysis of carbonate samples,
Supplement, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, A1025–A1025, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Wit, J. C., de Nooijer, L. J., Barras, C., Jorissen, F. J., and Reichart, G.
J.: A reappraisal of the vital effect in cultured benthic foraminifer
<italic>Bulimina marginata</italic> on Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca values: assessing temperature
uncertainty relationships, Biogeosciences, 9, 3693–3704,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3693-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3693-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Wit, J. C., de Nooijer, L. J., Wolthers, M., and Reichart, G. J.: A novel
salinity proxy based on Na incorporation into foraminiferal calcite,
Biogeosciences, 10, 6375–6387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6375-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6375-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J. and Elderfield, H.: Benthic foraminiferal B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca ratios reflect
deep water carbonate saturation state, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 258, 73–86,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J., Day, J., Greaves, M., and Elderfield, H.: Determination of multiple
element/ calcium ratios in foraminiferal calcite by quadrupole ICP-MS,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 6, Q08P01, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC000964</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ba incorporation in benthic foraminifera</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Barium (Ba) incorporated in the calcite of many foraminiferal species is
proportional to the concentration of Ba in seawater. Since the open ocean
concentration of Ba closely follows seawater alkalinity, foraminiferal
Ba ∕ Ca can be used to reconstruct the latter. Alternatively, Ba ∕ Ca
from foraminiferal shells can also be used to reconstruct salinity in coastal
settings in which seawater Ba concentration corresponds to salinity as rivers
contain much more Ba than seawater. Incorporation of a number of minor and
trace elements is known to vary (greatly) between foraminiferal species, and
application of element ∕ Ca ratios thus requires the use of
species-specific calibrations. Here we show that calcite Ba ∕ Ca
correlates positively and linearly with seawater Ba ∕ Ca in cultured
specimens of two species of benthic foraminifera: <i>Heterostegina
depressa</i> and <i>Amphistegina lessonii</i>. The slopes of the regression,
however, vary two- to threefold between these two species (0.33 and 0.78,
respectively). This difference in Ba partitioning resembles the difference in
partitioning of other elements (Mg, Sr, B, Li and Na) in these foraminiferal
taxa. A general trend across element partitioning for different species is
described, which may help develop new applications of trace elements in
foraminiferal calcite in reconstructing past seawater chemistry.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, K. A., Hönisch, B., Eggins, S. M., Yu, J., Spero, H. J., and
Elderfield, H.: Controls on Boron incorporation in cultured tests of the
planktic foraminifer <i>Orbulina universa</i>, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
309, 291–301, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, K. A., Hönisch, B., Eggins, S. M., and Rosenthal, Y.:
Environmental controls on B ∕ Ca in calcite tests of the tropical
planktic foraminifer species <i>Globigerinoides ruber</i> and
<i>Globigerinoides sacculifer</i>, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 351–352,
270–280, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Babila, T. L., Rosenthal, Y., and Conte, M. H.: Evaluation of the
biogeochemical controls on B ∕ Ca of <i>Globigerinoides ruber</i> from
the Ocean Flux Program, Bermuda, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 404, 67–76, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bahr, A., Schönfeld, J., Hoffmann, J., Voigt, S., Aurahs, R., Kucera, M.,
Slögel, S., Jentzen, A., and Gerdes, A.: Comparison of Ba ∕ Ca and
<i>δ</i>18Owater as freshwater proxies: A multi-species core-top study on
planktonic foraminifera from the vicinity of the Orinoco River mouth, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 383, 45–57, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bentov, S. and Erez, J.: Impact of biomineralization processes on the Mg
content of foraminiferal shells: A biological perspective, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 7, Q01P08, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001015</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bian, N. and Martin, P. A.: Investigating the fidelity of Mg ∕ Ca and
other element data from reductively cleaned planktonic foraminifera,
Paleoceanography 25, PA2215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001796</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, E. A.: Cadmium, zinc, copper and barium in foraminifera tests, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 53, 11–35, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, A. L., Brewer, P. G., Shafer, D. K., and Williams, R. T.:
Measurements of total carbon dioxide and alkalinity by potentiometric
titration in the GEOSECS program, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 55, 99–115, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S. and Peng T.-H.: Tracers in the Sea, Eldigo Press,
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Palisades, New York, USA, 690 pp.,
1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bryan, S. P. and Marchitto, T. M.: Mg ∕ Ca-temperature proxy in benthic
foraminifera: New calibrations from the Florida Straits and a hypothesis
regarding Mg/Li, Paleoceonography, 23, PA2220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001553</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, L. H., Drummond, D., Edmond, J. M., and Grant, B.: On the barium data
from the Atlantic GEOSECS expedition, Deep-Sea Res., 24, 613–649, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dawber, C. F. and Tripati, A.: Relationships between bottom water carbonate
saturation and element ∕ Ca ratios in coretop samples of the benthic
foraminifera <i>Oridorsalis umbonatus</i>, Biogeosciences, 9, 3029–3045,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3029-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3029-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Delaney, M. L., Bé, A. W. H., and Boyle E. A.: Li, Sr, Mg and Na in
foraminiferal clacite shells from laboratory culture, sediment traps, and
sediment cores, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 1327–1341, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J.: Data presented in the paper “Ba incorporation in benthic
foraminifera”, 4TU,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:d4b44881-16d7-4ada-bd09-85bce081bc84" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:d4b44881-16d7-4ada-bd09-85bce081bc84</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J., Toyofuku, T., and Kitazato, H.: Foraminifera promote
calcification by elevating their intracellular pH, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
106, 15374–15378, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J., Hathorne, E. C., Reichart, G. J., Langer, G., and Bijma,
J.: Variability in calcitic Mg ∕ Ca and Sr ∕ Ca ratios in clones of
the benthic foraminifer <i>Ammonia tepida</i>, Mar. Micropaleontol., 107,
33–43, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Nooijer, L. J., Spero, H. J., Erez, J., Bijma, J., and Reichart, G. J.:
Biomineralization in perforate foraminifera, Earth-Sci. Rev., 135, 48–58,
2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dickson, A. G. and Millero, F. J.: A comparison of the equilibrium constants
for dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater media, Deep-Sea Res.,
34, 1733–1743, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Da Rocha, R., Kuroyanagi, A., Bijma, J., and
Reichart, G. J.: Effect of salinity and seawater calcite saturation state on
Mg and Sr incorporation in cultured planktonic foraminifera, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 73, 178–189, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Raitzsch, M., De Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart,
G. J.: Independent impacts of calcium and carbonate ion concentration on Mg
and Sr incorporation in cultured benthic foraminifera, Mar. Micropaleontol.,
81, 122–130, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Eggins, S., De Deckker, P., and Marshall, J.: Mg ∕ Ca variation in
plaktonic foraminifera tests: implications for reconstructing palaeo-seawater
temperature and habitat migration, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 212, 291–306,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Elderfield, H., Cooper, M., and Ganssen, G.: Sr ∕ Ca in multiple species
of planktonic foraminifera: Implications for reconstructions of seawater
Sr ∕ Ca, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 1, GC000031,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GC000031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GC000031</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Elderfield, H., Vautravers, M., and Cooper, M.: The relationship between
shell size and Mg ∕ Ca, Sr ∕ Ca, <i>δ</i>18O, and <i>δ</i>13C of
species of planktonic foraminifera, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 3, GC000194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000194</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Elderfield, H., Yu, J., Anand, P., Kiefer, T., and Nyland, B.: Calibrations
for benthic foraminiferal Mg ∕ Ca paleothermometry and the carbonate ion
hypothesis, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 250, 633–649, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Erez, J.: The source of ions for biomineralization in foraminifera and their
implications for paleoceanographic proxies, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 54,
115–149, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, D., Erez, J., Oron, S., and Müller, W.: Mg ∕ Ca-temperature
and seawater-test chemistry relationships in the shallow-dwelling large
benthic foraminifera <i>Operculina ammonoides</i>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
148, 325–342, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Foster, G. L.: Seawater pH, <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and [CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2−</sup>] variations in the
Caribbean Sea over the last 130 kyr: A boron isotope and B ∕ Ca study of
planktonic foraminifera, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 271, 254–266, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Glas, M. S., Langer, G., and Keul, N.: Calcification acidifies the
microenvironment of a benthic foraminifer (<i>Ammonia</i> sp.), J. Exp.
Mar. Biol. Ecol., 424–425, 53–58, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gran, G.: Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations
– Part II, The Analyst, 77, 661–671, 1952.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Guay, C. K. and Falkner, K. K.: Barium as a tracer of Arctic halocline and
river waters, Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 44, 1543–1569, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Guay, C. K. and Falkner, K. K.: A survey of dissolved barium in the estuaries
of major Arctic rivers and adjacent seas, Cont. Shelf Res., 18, 859–882,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Guillong, M., Meier, D. L., Allan, M. M., Heinrich, C. A., and Yardley, B. W.
D.: SILLS: A MATLAB-based program for the reduction of laser ablation ICP-MS
data of homogeneous materials and inclusions, Mineralogical Association of
Canada Short Course, 40, 328–333, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, J. M. and Chan, L.-H.: Li ∕ Ca in multiple species of benthic and
planktonic foraminifera: Thermocline, latitudinal, and glacial-interglacial
variation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 529–545, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, J. M. and Chan, L.-H.: Ba ∕ Ca in <i>Neogloboquadrina
pachyderma</i> as an indicator of deglacial meltwater discharge into the western
Arctic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 19, PA000910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000910</a>,
2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hanor, J. S. and Chan, L.-H.: Non-conservative behavior of barium during
mixing of Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico waters, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 37, 242–250, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hatch, M. B. A., Schellenberg, S. A., and Carter, M. L.: Ba ∕ Ca
variations in the modern intertidal bean clam Donax gouldii: An upwelling
proxy?, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol., 373, 98–107, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hathorne, E. C., James, R. H., Savage, P., and Alard, O.: Physical and
chemical characteristics of particles produced by laser ablation of biogenic
calcium carbonate, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 23, 240–243, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hathorne, E. C., James, R. H., and Lampitt, R. S.: Environmental versus
biomineralization controls on the intratest variation in the trace element
composition of the planktonic foraminifera <i>G. inflata</i> and <i>G.
scitula</i>, Paleoceanography, 24, PA001742, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001742</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hemleben, C., Anderson, O. R., Berthold, W., and Spindler, M.: Calcification
and chamber formation in foraminifera – an overview, in: Biomineralization
in lower plants and animals, edited by: Leadbeater, B. S. C. and Riding, R.,
The Systematics Society, London, UK, 237–249, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hendry, K. R., Rickaby, R. E. M., Meredith, M. P., and Elderfield, H.:
Controls on stable isotope and trace metal uptake in <i>Neogloboquadrina
pachyderma</i> (sinistral) from an Antarctic sea-ice environment, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 278, 67–77, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, J., Bahr, A., Voigt, S., Schönfeld, J., Nürnberg, D., and
Rethemeyer, J.: Disentangling abrupt deglacial hydrological changes in
northern South America: Insolation versus oceanic forcing, Geology, 42,
579–582, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hönisch, B., Allen, K. A., Russell, A. D., Eggins, S. M., Bijma, J.,
Spero, H. J., Lea, D. W., and Yu, J.: Planktic foraminifers as recorders of
seawater Ba ∕ Ca, Mar. Micropaleontol., 79, 52–57, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppe, C. J. M., Langer, G., and Rost, B.: <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i> shows
identical responses to elevated <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> in TA and DIC manipulations, J.
Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 406, 54–62, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jochum, K. P., Weis, U., Stoll, B., Kuzmin, D., Yang, Q., Raczek, I., Jacob,
D. E., Stracke, A., Birbaum, K., Frick, D. A., Günther, D., and
Enzweiler, J.: Determiniation of reference values for NIST SRM 610–617
glasses following ISO guidelines, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 35, 397–429,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kaczmarek, K., Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Horn, I., Misra, S., Janse, M., and
Bijma, J.: Boron incorporation in the foraminifer Amphistegina lessonii under
a decoupled carbonate chemistry, Biogeosciences, 12, 1753–1763,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1753-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1753-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kester, D. R., Duedall, I. W., and Connors, D. N.: Preparation of artificial
seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 176–179, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kunioka, D., Shirai, K., Takahata, N., Sano, Y., Toyofuku, T., and Ujiie, Y.:
Microdistribution of Mg ∕ Ca, Sr ∕ Ca, and Ba ∕ Ca ratios in
<i>Pulleniatina obliquiloculata</i> test by using a NanoSIMS: Implication
for the vital effect mechanism, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, GC001280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001280</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Thoms, S., and Stoll, H.: Barium partitioning in
coccoliths of <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73,
2899–2906, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Langer, G., Sadekov, A., Thoms, S., Keul, N., Nehrke, G., Mewes, A., Greaves,
M., Misra, S., Reichart, G. J., De Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Elderfield,
H.: Sr partitioning in the benthic foraminifera <i>Ammonia aomoriensis</i>
and <i>Amphistegina lessonii</i>, Chem. Geol., 440, 306–312, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. and Boyle, E.: Barium content of benthic foraminifera controlled by
bottom-water composition, Nature, 338, 751–753, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W.: A trace metal perspective on the evolution of Antarctic
circumpolar deepwater chemistry, Paleoceanography, 10, 733–747, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: A 210 000-year record of barium variability in
the deep northwest Atlantic Ocean, Nature, 347, 269–272, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: Barium in planktonic foraminifera, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 55, 3321–3331, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Boyle, E. A.: Determination of carbonate-bound barium in
foraminifera and corals by isotope dilution plasma-mass spectrometry, Chem.
Geol., 103, 73–84, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Spero, H. J.: Experimental determination of barium uptake in
shells of the planktonic foraminifera <i>Orbulina universa</i> at
22 °C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 2673–2680, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W. and Spero, H. J.: Assessing the reliability of paleochemical
tracers: Barium uptake in the shells of planktonic foraminifera,
Paleoceanography, 9, 445–452, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lea, D. W., Shen, G. T., and Boyle, E. A.: Coralline barium records temporal
variability in equatorial Pacific upwelling, Nature, 340, 373–376, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Lear, C. H., Mawbey, E. M., and Rosenthal, Y.: Cenozoic benthic foraminiferal
Mg ∕ Ca and Li ∕ Ca records: Toward unlocking temperatures and
saturation states, Paleoceanography, 25, PA001880,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001880</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. J.: Algal symbiosis in larger foraminifera, Symbiosis, 42, 63–75,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y.-H. and Chan, L.-H.: Desorption of Ba and 226Ra from river-borne
sediments in the Hudson Estuary, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 37, 242–250, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Marr, J. P., Carter, L., Bostock, H. C., Bolton, A., and Smith, E.: Southwest
Pacific Ocean response to a warming world: Using Mg ∕ Ca, Zn ∕ Ca,
and Mn ∕ Ca in foraminifera to track surface ocean water masses during
the last deglaciation, Paleoceanography, 28, 347–362, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Marriott, C. S., Henderson, G. M., Crompton, R., Staubwasser, M., and Shaw,
S.: Effect of mineralogy, salinity, and temperature on Li ∕ Ca and Li
isotope composition of calcium carbonate, Chem. Geol., 212, 5–15, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E., and Pytkowicz, R. N.:
Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in
seawater at atmospheric pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, A., Langer, G., De Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Reichart, G. J.:
Effect of different seawater Mg<sup>2+</sup> concentrations on calcification in two
benthic foraminifers, Mar. Micropaleontol., 113, 56–64, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, A., Langer, G., Reichart, G. J., De Nooijer, L. J., Nehrke, G., and
Bijma, J.: The impact of Mg contents on Sr partitioning in benthic
foraminifers, Chem. Geol., 412, 92–98, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Morse, J. W. and Bender, M. L.: Partition coefficients in calcite:
Examination of factors influencing the validity of experimental results and
their application to natural systems, Chem. Geol., 82, 265–277, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Morse, J. W., Arvidson, R. S., and Lüttge, A.: Calcium carbonate
formation and dissolution, Chem. Rev., 107, 342–381, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Mucci, A. and Morse, J. W.: The incorporation of Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Sr<sup>2+</sup> into
calcite overgrowths: influences of growth rate and solution composition,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 47, 217–233, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Nehrke, G., Keul, N., Langer, G., de Nooijer, L. J., Bijma, J., and Meibom,
A.: A new model for biomineralization and trace-element signatures of
Foraminifera tests, Biogeosciences, 10, 6759–6767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6759-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6759-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Ni, Y., Foster, G. L., Bailey, T., Elliott, T., Schmidt, D. N., Pearson, P.,
Haley, B., and Coath, C.: A core top assessment of proxies for the ocean
carbonate system in surface-dwelling foraminifera, Paleoceanography, 22,
PA3212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001337</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Ni Flaithearta, S., Reichart, G. J., Jorissen, F. J., Fontanier, C., Rohling,
E. J., Thomson, J., and De Lange, G.: Reconstructing the seafloor environment
during sapropel formation using benthic foraminiferal trace metals, stable
isotopes, and sediment composition, Paleoceanography, 25, PA4225,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009PA001869</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Nürnberg, D., Bijma, J., and Hemleben, C.: Assessing the reliability of
magnesium in foraminiferal calcite as a proxy for water mass temperatures,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 80, 803–814, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Okai, T., Suzuki, A., Kawahata, H., Terashima, S., and Imai, N.: Preparation
of a New Geological Survey of Japan Geochemical Reference Material: Coral
JCp-1, Geostandard. Newslett., 26, 95–99, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Pak, D. K., Lea, D. W., and Kennett, J. P.: Seasonal and interannual
variation in Santa Barbara Basin water temperatures observed in sediment trap
foraminiferal Mg ∕ Ca, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q12008,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000760" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000760</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Pierrot, D., Lewis, E., and Wallace, D. W. R.: MS Excel program developed for
CO<sub>2</sub> system calculations. ORNL/CDIAC-105. Carbon dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US department of Energy, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, USA, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Raitzsch, M., Hathorne, E. C., Kuhnert H., Groeneveld, J., and Bickert, T.:
Modern and late Pleistocene B ∕ Ca ratios of the benthic foraminifer
<i>Planulina wuellerstorfi </i>determined with laser ablation ICP-MS,
Geology, 39, 1039–1042, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Raja, R., Saraswati, P. K., Rogers, K., and Iwao, K.: Magnesium and strontium
compositions of recent symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 58, 31–44, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, M. M. and Nancollas, G. H.: The crystallization of calcium carbonate:
IV. The effect of magnesium, strontium and sulfate ions, J. Crystal Growth,
35, 33–38, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Reichart, G. J., Jorissen, F., Anschutz, P., and Mason, P. R. D.: Single
foraminiferal test chemistry records the marine environment, Geology, 31,
355–358, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Rubin, S. I., King, S. L., Jahnke, R. A., and Froelich, P. N.: Benthic barium
and alkalinity fluxes: Is Ba an oceanic paleo-alkalinity proxy for glacial
atmosphere CO<sub>2</sub>?, Geophy. Res. Lett., 30, 1885,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017339</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Sadekov, A., Eggins, S. M., De Deckker, P., and Kroon, D.: Uncertainties in
seawater thermometry deriving from intratest and intertest Mg ∕ Ca
variability in <i>Globigerinoides ruber</i>, Paleoceanography, 23,
PA0014502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001452</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Sadekov, A., Bush, F., Kerr, J., Ganeshram, R., and Elderfield, H.:
Mg ∕ Ca composition of benthic foraminifera <i>Miliolacea </i>as a new
tool of paleoceanography, Paleoceanography, 29, 990–1001, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Segev, E. and Erez, J.: Effect of Mg ∕ Ca ratio in seawater on shell
composition in shallow benthic foraminifera, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7,
GC000969, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000969</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Ter Kuile, B. H. and Erez, J.: Carbon budgets for two species of benthonic
symbiont-bearing foraminifera, Biol. Bull., 180, 489–495, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Toyofuku, T., Kitazato, H., and Kawahata, H.: Evaluation of Mg ∕ Ca
thermometry in foraminifera: Comparison of experimental results and
measurements in nature, Paleoceanography, 15, 456–464, 2000.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Toyofuku, T., Suzuki, M., Suga, H., Sakai, S., Suzuki, A., Ishikawa, T., De
Nooijer, L. J., Schiebel, R., Kawahata, H., and Kitazato, H.: Mg ∕ Ca and
<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O in the brackish shallow-water benthic foraminifer
<i>Ammonia <q>beccarii</q></i>, Mar. Micropaleontol., 78, 113–120, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Toyofuku, T., Matsuo, M. Y., De Nooijer, L. J., Nagai, Y., Kawada, S.,
Fujita, K., Reichart, G.-J., Nomaki, H., Tsuchiya, M., Sakaguchi, H., and
Kitazato, H.: Proton pumping accompanies calcification in foraminifera, Nat.
Commun., 8, 14145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14145</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
van Dijk, I., de Nooijer, L. J., and Reichart, G.-J.: Trends in element
incorporation in hyaline and porcelaneous foraminifera as a function of
<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Biogeosciences, 14, 497–510,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-497-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-497-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Weldeab, S., Lea, D. W., Schneider, R. R., and Andersen, N.: 155 000 years
of west African monsoon and ocean thermal evolution, Science, 316,
1303–1307, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Weldeab, S., Lea, D. W., Oberhänsli, H., and Schneider, R. R.: Links
between southwestern tropical Indian Ocean SST and precipitation over
southeastern Africa over the last 17 kyr, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol.
Palaeoecol., 410, 200–212, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, S. A., Koenig, A. E., and Orklid, R.: Development of microanalytical
reference material (MACS-3) for LA-ICP-MS analysis of carbonate samples,
Supplement, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, A1025–A1025, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Wit, J. C., de Nooijer, L. J., Barras, C., Jorissen, F. J., and Reichart, G.
J.: A reappraisal of the vital effect in cultured benthic foraminifer
<i>Bulimina marginata</i> on Mg ∕ Ca values: assessing temperature
uncertainty relationships, Biogeosciences, 9, 3693–3704,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3693-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3693-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Wit, J. C., de Nooijer, L. J., Wolthers, M., and Reichart, G. J.: A novel
salinity proxy based on Na incorporation into foraminiferal calcite,
Biogeosciences, 10, 6375–6387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6375-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6375-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J. and Elderfield, H.: Benthic foraminiferal B ∕ Ca ratios reflect
deep water carbonate saturation state, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 258, 73–86,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J., Day, J., Greaves, M., and Elderfield, H.: Determination of multiple
element/ calcium ratios in foraminiferal calcite by quadrupole ICP-MS,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 6, Q08P01, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000964</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>