Comparing distribution of harbour porpoise using generalized additive models and hierarchical Bayesian models with integrated nested laplace approximation

Williamson, LD; Scott, BE; Laxton, M; Illian, JB; Todd, VLG; Miller, PI; Brookes, KL. 2022 Comparing distribution of harbour porpoise using generalized additive models and hierarchical Bayesian models with integrated nested laplace approximation. Ecological Modelling, 470. 110011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110011

[img]
Preview
Text
Williamson_et_al_Ecol_Model_2022_porpoise_model.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110011

Abstract/Summary

Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are used regularly to develop management strategies, but many modelling methods ignore the spatial nature of data. To address this, we compared fine-scale spatial distribution predictions of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) using empirical aerial-video-survey data collected along the east coast of Scotland in August and September 2010 and 2014. Incorporating environmental covariates that cover habitat preferences and prey proxies, we used a traditional (and commonly implemented) Generalized Additive Model (GAM), and two Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling (HBM) approaches using Integrated Nested Laplace Approxi�mation (INLA) model-fitting methodology. One HBM-INLA modelled gridded space (similar to the GAM), and the other dealt more explicitly in continuous space using a Log-Gaussian Cox Process (LGCP). Overall, predicted distributions in the three models were similar; however, HBMs had twice the level of certainty, showed much finer-scale patterns in porpoise distribution, and identified some areas of high relative density that were not apparent in the GAM. Spatial differences were due to how the two methods accounted for autocorrelation, spatial clustering of animals, and differences between modelling in discrete vs. continuous space; consequently, methods for spatial analyses likely depend on scale at which results, and certainty, are needed. For large-scale analysis (>5–10 km resolution, e.g. initial impact assessment), there was little difference be�tween results; however, insights into fine-scale (<1 km) distribution of porpoise from the HBM model using LGCP, while more computationally costly, offered potential benefits for refining conservation management or mitigation measures within offshore developments or protected areas.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Additional Keywords: Bayesian model Generalized additive model (GAM) Integrated nested laplace approximation (INLA) Harbour porpoise Species distribution model
Divisions: Plymouth Marine Laboratory > National Capability categories > NERC Earth Observation Data Acquisition & Analysis Service (NEODAAS)
Depositing User: S Hawkins
Date made live: 17 Jun 2022 10:58
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2022 11:00
URI: http://plymsea.ac.uk/id/eprint/9727

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item